FZRO
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
VS
VTI
VTI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF

FZROX vs VTI: Which Should You Buy?

About 96% the same holdings.

Want to check another pair? Use the free ETF overlap tool.

The verdict

Over the period we can measure, VTI has returned about 1.4% a year more and overlap about 96% by weight. Pick FZROX for the tighter 2,628-holding portfolio; pick VTI to own 3,519 instead.

This is purely for informational purposes, not investment advice. Always consult a professional before making investment decisions.

FZROX wins if...

You want the tighter portfolio: 2,628 holdings rather than 3,519, tracking the Fidelity U.S. Total Investable Market Index.

VTI wins if...

You want maximum diversification: 3,519 holdings covering the broader market, tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index.

FZROX vs VTI, side by side

The numbers that actually differ are highlighted.

MetricFZROXFidelity ZERO Total Market Index FundVTIVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Index trackedFidelity U.S. Total Investable Market IndexCRSP US Total Market Index
Number of holdings2,6283,519
Expense ratio—0.03%
Dividend yield0.92%1.06%
AUM—$689.20B
Top 10 concentration34.9%34.6%
10-yr total return13.7%15.1%
5-yr total return10.7%10.6%
Beta (vs S&P 500)1.021.02
Max drawdown (10yr)-35.0%-35.0%
Market-cap coverageLarge + mid + smallLarge + mid + small
Inception20182001

— means the figure is not reported for that fund.

The difference in one line

FZROX holds 2,628 positions tracking the Fidelity U.S. Total Investable Market Index. VTI holds 3,519, a broader slice of the same market.

How much do FZROX and VTI overlap?

The single most decision-relevant fact, and the one most comparisons skip.

96%overlap
Shared
96.4%
VTI-only
3.6%

~96% identical by weight

2,115 weighted positions appear in both funds, and by weight about 96% of the two portfolios is the same exposure. Where a stock sits in both, the shared share is whichever weight is smaller. That is the part of a dollar that behaves identically in either fund.

The difference is VTI's remaining 891 positions, which FZROX does not hold at all. They are smaller by weight, which is why the two track each other closely and drift apart only at the margins.

Growth of $10,000: FZROX vs VTI

Growth of $10,000

8 years

FZROX $29,131VTI $30,215
$10k$20k$30kY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8
Year 8FZROX: $29,131VTI: $30,215Spread: $1,084

Which should you choose?

FZFZROXChoose if you want...
  • You want concentrated exposure: 2,628 holdings, not 3,519
  • You want to track the Fidelity U.S. Total Investable Market Index
VTIVTIChoose if you want...
  • You want the wider net: 3,519 holdings against 2,628
  • You want to track the CRSP US Total Market Index
  • You want the higher yield: 1.06% against 0.92%
ETF metrics pulled into a spreadsheet with Wisesheets

Compare and track all ETFs in your sheet

Type =WISE("FZROX","dividend yield","ttm") or =WISEFUNDS("FZROX","expense ratio") in Excel or Google Sheets and the fund's data lands in your sheet, ready to be refreshed when you want.

Get The Add-in - Free

FZROX vs VTI frequently asked questions

VTI has the stronger record, by about 1.4% a year and they overlap roughly 96% by weight. Compare the fee and the holdings count below and pick the one that matches how broad you want the exposure to be.

Yes, by about 96% by weight. 2,115 weighted positions appear in both funds. Because the largest positions dominate both portfolios, the two behave similarly day to day.

FZROX holds 2,628 positions tracking the Fidelity U.S. Total Investable Market Index. VTI holds 3,519, a broader slice of the same market.

You can, but there is little reason to. At about 96% overlap, owning both mostly duplicates the same positions and adds little diversification.