VT
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
VS
VTI
VTI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF

VT vs VTI: Which Should You Buy?

Same fund company (Vanguard), 0.03% vs 0.06% fee.

Want to check another pair? Use the free ETF overlap tool.

The verdict

Over the period we can measure, VTI has returned about 2.6% a year more and overlap about 62% by weight. Pick VTI for the tighter 3,519-holding portfolio; pick VT to own 10,185 instead. VTI is the cheaper of the two at 0.03% against 0.06%.

This is purely for informational purposes, not investment advice. Always consult a professional before making investment decisions.

VT wins if...

You want maximum diversification: 10,185 holdings covering the broader market, tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index.

VTI wins if...

You want the tighter portfolio: 3,519 holdings rather than 10,185, tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, at a lower 0.03% fee.

VT vs VTI, side by side

The numbers that actually differ are highlighted.

MetricVTVanguard Total World Stock ETFVTIVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Index trackedFTSE Global All Cap IndexCRSP US Total Market Index
Number of holdings10,1853,519
Expense ratio0.06%0.03%
Dividend yield1.56%1.06%
AUM$81.80B$689.20B
Top 10 concentration22.1%34.6%
10-yr total return12.5%15.1%
5-yr total return9.6%10.6%
Beta (vs S&P 500)0.941.02
Max drawdown (10yr)-34.2%-35.0%
Market-cap coverageGlobalLarge + mid + small
Inception20082001
The difference in one line

VTI holds 3,519 positions tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. VT holds 10,185, a broader slice of the same market.

How much do VT and VTI overlap?

The single most decision-relevant fact, and the one most comparisons skip.

62%overlap
Shared
62.4%
VTI-only
39.4%

~62% identical by weight

1,474 weighted positions appear in both funds, and by weight about 62% of the two portfolios is the same exposure. Where a stock sits in both, the shared share is whichever weight is smaller. That is the part of a dollar that behaves identically in either fund.

The difference is VT's remaining 6,666 positions, which VTI does not hold at all. They are smaller by weight, which is why the two track each other closely and drift apart only at the margins.

Growth of $10,000: VT vs VTI

Growth of $10,000

10 years

VT $34,495VTI $40,948
$10k$20k$30k$40kY2Y4Y6Y8Y10
Year 10VT: $34,495VTI: $40,948Spread: $6,453

Which should you choose?

VTVTChoose if you want...
  • You want the wider net: 10,185 holdings against 3,519
  • You want to track the FTSE Global All Cap Index
  • You want the higher yield: 1.56% against 1.06%
VTIVTIChoose if you want...
  • You want concentrated exposure: 3,519 holdings, not 10,185
  • You want to track the CRSP US Total Market Index
  • You want the lower fee: 0.03% against 0.06%
  • You want the larger, more heavily traded fund ($689.2B)
ETF metrics pulled into a spreadsheet with Wisesheets

Compare and track all ETFs in your sheet

Type =WISE("VT","dividend yield","ttm") or =WISEFUNDS("VT","expense ratio") in Excel or Google Sheets and the fund's data lands in your sheet, ready to be refreshed when you want.

Get The Add-in - Free

VT vs VTI frequently asked questions

VTI has the stronger record, by about 2.6% a year and they overlap roughly 62% by weight. Compare the fee and the holdings count below and pick the one that matches how broad you want the exposure to be.

Yes, by about 62% by weight. 1,474 weighted positions appear in both funds. Because the largest positions dominate both portfolios, the two behave similarly day to day.

VTI holds 3,519 positions tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. VT holds 10,185, a broader slice of the same market.

Yes. At about 62% overlap the two hold substantially different positions, so holding both does broaden the exposure.