Start with its own history
Compare positive annual observations to understand how this company has been priced over time. A lower multiple can reflect a lower price, higher earnings, or weaker growth expectations—not necessarily a bargain.
NASDAQ · LAKEApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesUpdated Nov 2, 2026
Lakeland Industries, Inc. P/E ratio
Current valuation, historical context, and peer comparisons.
Current P/E ratio
N/M
No meaningful positive P/E available.
Share price8.9
÷Earnings per share-2.76
Price and EPS in quote currency. Calculation details
Zero or negative earnings do not produce a meaningful conventional P/E.
P/E over time
2017 – 2026
Annual P/ESelected-period average 56.83×
3-year average24.34×1 positive annual observations
5-year average32.29×3 positive annual observations
10-year average56.83×8 positive annual observations
Peer median · TTM22.27×2 peers with positive P/E
Historical P/E ratios
Annual period-end data · 25 observations
| Period end | P/E | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2026 | N/M | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2025 | N/M | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2024 | 24.34× | -58.0% |
| Jan 31, 2023 | 57.92× | +296.8% |
| Jan 31, 2022 | 14.60× | +111.5% |
| Jan 31, 2021 | 6.90× | -79.7% |
| Jan 31, 2020 | 34.00× | -45.0% |
| Jan 31, 2019 | 61.78× | -73.7% |
View all 25 annual observations +
| Period end | P/E | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2018 | 235.00× | +1069.6% |
| Jan 31, 2017 | 20.09× | -21.1% |
| Jan 31, 2016 | 25.46× | +304.4% |
| Jan 31, 2015 | 6.30× | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2014 | N/M | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2013 | N/M | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2012 | N/M | N/M |
| Jan 31, 2011 | 49.17× | +10.6% |
| Jan 31, 2010 | 44.47× | +384.5% |
| Jan 31, 2009 | 9.18× | -44.1% |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 16.43× | +3.1% |
| Jan 31, 2007 | 15.95× | +8.9% |
| Jan 31, 2006 | 14.64× | -8.5% |
| Jan 31, 2005 | 16.00× | +21.4% |
| Jan 31, 2004 | 13.18× | +66.1% |
| Jan 31, 2003 | 7.94× | -35.2% |
| Jan 31, 2002 | 12.25× | N/M |
Change is relative to the preceding observation. N/M values are excluded from averages.
How LAKE compares
Company P/E vs. peer trailing-12-month ratios
| Company | P/E ratio |
|---|---|
 LAKE This stockLakeland Industries, Inc. | N/M |
 SGCSuperior Group of Companies, Inc. | 23.66× |
 PLCEThe Children's Place, Inc. | N/M |
 BARKBARK, Inc. | N/M |
 GDHGGolden Heaven Group Holdings Ltd. | N/M |
 DBIDesigner Brands Inc. | 20.88× |
 AIIORobo.ai Inc. | N/M |
 FNKOFunko, Inc. | N/M |
 FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. | N/M |
Peers are selected by the data provider. Business models and earnings definitions can differ.
Put the numbers in context
What does LAKE’s P/E tell you?
Compare like with like
The median of the 2 positive peer ratios above is 22.27×. Check growth, margins, debt, and earnings quality before interpreting the gap. A faster-growing business may justify a higher multiple.
Check what drives earnings
One-off gains can temporarily lower P/E; unusual charges can raise it. Reported earnings and forward estimates answer different questions. Pair this view with return on equity and liquidity for a fuller picture.
Keep your research connected
Take LAKE into your spreadsheet
Pull historical P/E into Excel or Google Sheets with Wisesheets. Build your own comparisons alongside the rest of your financial model.
Explore WisesheetsQuarterly P/E · latest quarterLQ selects the latest reported quarter. Requires the Wisesheets add-in. See available data
=WISE("LAKE", "PE Ratio", "LQ")Sources & calculation methodology
Current P/E
A conventional P/E is not meaningful when earnings are zero or negative. Data is supplied by Financial Modeling Prep through Wisesheets. Quote feed updated Nov 2, 2026; this is not a real-time trading quote.
History & averages
Annual and quarterly P/E observations are provided separately from the current quote. Averages use the latest 3, 5, or 10 annual observations, excluding missing and nonpositive ratios. Pre-IPO observations are omitted. These are period-end observations, not daily averages.
Data definitions and limitations
The current quote feed does not specify the exact EPS filing-period end or whether EPS is basic or diluted. We do not label it as forward P/E. Peer ratios are explicitly trailing-12-month (TTM) values. Historical observations do not include independently verified price and EPS inputs. Sources may update on different schedules; rounded inputs can produce small calculation differences. Historical comparisons describe past pricing, not an estimate of fair value.
LAKE P/E ratio: common questions
The essentials behind the numbers.
Lakeland Industries, Inc. does not currently have a meaningful positive P/E in the quote data. A zero or negative EPS makes the conventional P/E unsuitable for comparison.
Annual P/E uses earnings for a completed fiscal year. Trailing-12-month (TTM) P/E uses the latest four quarters, while forward P/E uses forecast earnings. These are not interchangeable. This page labels peer ratios as TTM and shows dated annual or quarterly historical observations; it does not show forward estimates.
N/M means not meaningful: the feed has no positive P/E for that observation. Negative or zero earnings should not be ranked as a low positive valuation multiple. N/M observations are excluded from the averages shown above.
Divide the share price by earnings per share (EPS). For example, a share price of 100 and EPS of 5 gives a P/E of 20×. This page uses the price and EPS supplied together in the quote when both are positive.
Price timestamps, EPS definitions, share classes, adjustments, and fiscal periods can differ. A forward P/E also uses forecast earnings rather than reported earnings. Compare the inputs and as-of dates before comparing two displayed ratios.
Not necessarily. The average describes previous market pricing, not fair value. Changes in earnings quality, growth expectations, debt, accounting, and business risk can justify a different multiple today.