
Liquidity, historical trends, and peer comparisons.
According to CITIC Resources Holdings Limited’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current Current Ratio is 2.00. This represents a change of 30.76% compared to the average of 1.53 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical Current Ratio of CITIC Resources Holdings Limited over the last ten years is 2.05. The current 2.00 Current Ratio has changed -2.83% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), CTJHF's Current Ratio was at its highest in in the June 2018 quarter at 4.06. The Current Ratio was at its lowest in in the June 2007 quarter at 0.
Average
2.05
Median
1.77
Minimum
1.34
Maximum
3.41
Discovering the peaks and valleys of CITIC Resources Holdings Limited Current Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 98.87%
Maximum Annual Current Ratio = 3.41
Minimum Annual Increase = -59.42%
Minimum Annual Current Ratio = 1.34
| Year | Current Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.63 | 21.39% |
| 2024 | 1.34 | -21.88% |
| 2023 | 1.72 | -35.22% |
| 2022 | 2.66 | 16.42% |
| 2021 | 2.28 | -20.02% |
| 2020 | 2.85 | 98.87% |
| 2019 | 1.43 | 3.67% |
| 2018 | 1.38 | -59.42% |
| 2017 | 3.41 | 86.73% |
| 2016 | 1.83 | 1.64% |
The current Current Ratio of CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
1.57
5-year avg
1.93
10-year avg
2.05
CITIC Resources Holdings Limited’s Current Ratio is greater than United Company RUSAL, International Public Joint-Stock Company (0.72), greater than Chuangxin Industries Holdings Limited (0.71), greater than MMG Limited (1.12), greater than United Energy Group Limited (1.05), less than CNOOC Limited (2.80), greater than Mongolia Energy Corporation Limited (0.69), greater than Mongolian Mining Corporation (1.49), greater than E-Commodities Holdings Limited (1.39), greater than China Qinfa Group Ltd. (1.06), less than Huili Resources (Group) Limited (2.34),
| Company | Current Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | $42.54B | |
| 0.71 | $30.77B | |
| 1.12 | $91.34B | |
| 1.05 | $11.06B | |
| 2.80 | $1.10T | |
| 0.69 | $94.06M | |
| 1.49 | $7.32B | |
| 1.39 | $1.70B | |
| 1.06 | $4.76B | |
| 2.34 | $246.07M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like CITIC Resources Holdings Limited using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like CITIC Resources Holdings Limited or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the Current Ratio?
How can you use the Current Ratio?
What is CITIC Resources Holdings Limited's Current Ratio?
How is the Current Ratio calculated for CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF)?
What is the highest Current Ratio for CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF)?
What is the 3-year average Current Ratio for CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF)?
What is the 5-year average Current Ratio for CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF)?
How does the current Current Ratio for CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (CTJHF) compare to its historical average?