SKFOF
Price:
$199.66
Market Cap:
$26.11B
Sika AG engages in the development and production of systems and products for bonding, sealing, damping, reinforcing, and protecting in the building sector and motor vehicle. It offers solutions for concrete, waterproofing, cement additives, rigid bonding, joint sealing, and tunneling and mining. The company was founded by Kaspar Winkler in 1910 and is headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.
Industry
Chemicals
IPO Date
2018-07-19
Stock Exchange
OTC
Ticker
SKFOF
According to Sika AG’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 33.11. This represents a change of 122.23% compared to the average of 14.90 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Sika AG over the last ten years is 33.12. The current 33.11 PE Ratio has changed 9.90% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), SKFOF's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2021 quarter at 24.37. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the December 2008 quarter at 4.17.
Average
33.12
Median
29.83
Minimum
21.95
Maximum
55.02
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Sika AG PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 38.38%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 55.02
Minimum Annual Increase = -46.77%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 21.95
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24.98 | -10.18% |
| 2024 | 27.81 | -30.40% |
| 2023 | 39.96 | 36.43% |
| 2022 | 29.29 | -46.77% |
| 2021 | 55.02 | 32.43% |
| 2020 | 41.55 | 21.32% |
| 2019 | 34.25 | 31.44% |
| 2018 | 26.06 | -14.22% |
| 2017 | 30.37 | 38.38% |
| 2016 | 21.95 | 10.31% |
The current PE Ratio of Sika AG (SKFOF) is greater than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
30.91
5-year avg
35.41
10-year avg
33.12
Sika AG’s PE Ratio is greater than PT. Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk (5.53), less than Novozymes A/S (42.96), less than Novozymes A/S (42.96), less than UltraTech Cement Limited Sponsored GDR RegS (42.19), greater than Givaudan S.A. (29.76), greater than Givaudan S.A. (29.76), greater than Akzo Nobel N.V. (15.73), greater than ArcelorMittal S.A. (17.19), greater than Gold Fields Limited (8.31), greater than PT. Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk (5.53),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 5.53 | $45.56B | |
| 42.96 | $30.14B | |
| 42.96 | $28.97B | |
| 42.19 | $29.68B | |
| 29.76 | $37.20B | |
| 29.76 | $39.16B | |
| 15.73 | $33.57B | |
| 17.19 | $49.47B | |
| 8.31 | $32.02B | |
| 5.53 | $6.92B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Sika AG using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Sika AG or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Sika AG's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Sika AG (SKFOF)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Sika AG (SKFOF)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Sika AG (SKFOF)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Sika AG (SKFOF)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Sika AG (SKFOF) compare to its historical average?