NUSMF
Price:
$0.000001
Market Cap:
$683.00
Nautilus Minerals, Inc. engages in mineral property exploration. It explores the ocean floor for copper, gold, silver, zinc seafloor massive sulfide, manganese, nickel, copper, and cobalt nodule deposits. The company was founded on January 26, 1987 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.
Industry
Other Precious Metals
IPO Date
2011-10-12
Stock Exchange
OTC
Ticker
NUSMF
According to Nautilus Minerals Inc.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current ROE is -3.93%. This represents a change of 308.83% compared to the average of -0.96% of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical ROE of Nautilus Minerals Inc. over the last ten years is -12.95%. The current -3.93% ROE has changed -69.67% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), NUSMF's ROE was at its highest in in the September 2018 quarter at 0.66%. The ROE was at its lowest in in the September 2015 quarter at -3.50%.
Average
-12.95%
Median
-11.17%
Minimum
-31.89%
Maximum
-3.92%
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Nautilus Minerals Inc. ROE, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 225.71%
Maximum Annual ROE = -3.92%
Minimum Annual Increase = -63.57%
Minimum Annual ROE = -31.89%
| Year | ROE | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | -3.92% | -32.44% |
| 2016 | -5.81% | -45.84% |
| 2015 | -10.72% | 99.20% |
| 2014 | -5.38% | -35.44% |
| 2013 | -8.34% | -48.64% |
| 2012 | -16.23% | 23.02% |
| 2011 | -13.19% | -41.11% |
| 2010 | -22.40% | 92.80% |
| 2009 | -11.62% | -63.57% |
| 2008 | -31.89% | 225.71% |
The current ROE of Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-6.82%
5-year avg
-6.83%
10-year avg
-12.95%
Nautilus Minerals Inc.’s ROE is greater than Cadillac Ventures Inc. (-161.79%), less than BPM Inc. (0%), less than Kibush Capital Corporation (22.74%), less than Trilliant Exploration Corporation (0%), less than Raven Gold Corp. (0%), less than St. Elias Mines Ltd. (67.64%), less than Home Solutions Health Inc. (0%), less than GoldOz Limited (0%), less than Mascot Mines Inc. (0%), less than Colossus Minerals Inc. (0%),
| Company | ROE | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| -161.79% | $503.00 | |
| 0% | $617.00 | |
| 22.74% | $737.00 | |
| 0% | $191.00 | |
| 0% | $352.00 | |
| 67.64% | $117.00 | |
| 0% | $246.00 | |
| 0% | $1.30K | |
| 0% | $7.00 | |
| 0% | $176.00 |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Nautilus Minerals Inc. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Nautilus Minerals Inc. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the ROE?
How can you use the ROE?
What is Nautilus Minerals Inc.'s ROE?
How is the ROE calculated for Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF)?
What is the highest ROE for Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF)?
What is the 3-year average ROE for Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF)?
What is the 5-year average ROE for Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF)?
How does the current ROE for Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUSMF) compare to its historical average?