TGLDF
Price:
$0.23
Market Cap:
$1.05M
Renegade Gold Inc. is a British Columbia based company engaged in the business of acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties located in the highly prospective Red Lake Mining District of Northern Ontario.
Industry
Gold
IPO Date
2013-02-19
Stock Exchange
OTC
Ticker
TGLDF
According to Renegade Gold Inc.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -0.33. This represents a change of -98.43% compared to the average of -20.98 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Renegade Gold Inc. over the last ten years is -50.81. The current -0.33 PE Ratio has changed -35.06% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), TGLDF's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the June 2013 quarter at 56.06. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the June 2015 quarter at -264.70.
Average
-50.81
Median
-32.25
Minimum
-130.33
Maximum
-1.47
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Renegade Gold Inc. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 2.04%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = -1.47
Minimum Annual Increase = -95.65%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -130.33
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -9.92 | -66.49% |
| 2021 | -29.59 | -70.79% |
| 2020 | -101.29 | -22.28% |
| 2019 | -130.33 | 423.19% |
| 2018 | -24.91 | -20.77% |
| 2017 | -31.44 | 2.04% |
| 2016 | -1.47 | -95.65% |
| 2015 | -33.79 | 2.22% |
| 2014 | -33.06 | -70.58% |
| 2013 | -112.35 | 200.65% |
The current PE Ratio of Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-46.93
5-year avg
-59.21
10-year avg
-50.81
Renegade Gold Inc.’s PE Ratio is greater than Lodestar Minerals Limited (-2.37), greater than Q Precious & Battery Metals Corp. (-1.27), greater than Conquest Resources Limited (-12.45), greater than Renforth Resources Inc. (-6.25), greater than Gold Port Corporation (-9.51), greater than Kalgoorlie Gold Mining Limited (-12.48), greater than Opus One Gold Corporation (-9.10), greater than Kestrel Gold Inc. (-21.83), less than Lupaka Gold Corp. (31.25), greater than AmmPower Corp. (-2.60),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| -2.37 | $10.12M | |
| -1.27 | $4.04M | |
| -12.45 | $4.81M | |
| -6.25 | $7.13M | |
| -9.51 | $6.08M | |
| -12.48 | $8.46M | |
| -9.10 | $9.34M | |
| -21.83 | $5.12M | |
| 31.25 | $3.20M | |
| -2.60 | $1.89M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Renegade Gold Inc. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Renegade Gold Inc. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Renegade Gold Inc.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Renegade Gold Inc. (TGLDF) compare to its historical average?