GPP.WA
Price:
$48.75
Market Cap:
$3.36B
Grupa Pracuj S.A. operates in the digital recruitment market in Poland and Ukraine. The company operates Pracuj.pl and Robota.ua that are recruitment websites; Dryg.pl, a recruitment platform for manual workers; Theprotocol.it, a recruitment website for IT employees; and eRecruiter, a system bolstering recruitment processes. Grupa Pracuj S.A. was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland.
Industry
Staffing & Employment Services
IPO Date
2021-12-09
Stock Exchange
WSE
Ticker
GPP.WA
According to Grupa Pracuj S.A.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 14.68. This represents a change of -21.72% compared to the average of 18.75 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Grupa Pracuj S.A. over the last ten years is 25.07. The current 14.68 PE Ratio has changed 5.75% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), GPP.WA's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2022 quarter at 52.13. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the June 2021 quarter at 9.61.
Average
25.07
Median
21.00
Minimum
0
Maximum
44.32
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Grupa Pracuj S.A. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = Infinity%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 44.32
Minimum Annual Increase = -56.82%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 0
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19.11 | -16.44% |
| 2023 | 22.87 | 36.47% |
| 2022 | 16.76 | -12.41% |
| 2021 | 19.14 | -56.82% |
| 2020 | 44.32 | 18.34% |
| 2019 | 37.45 | -8.52% |
| 2018 | 40.94 | Infinity% |
The current PE Ratio of Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
19.58
5-year avg
24.44
10-year avg
25.07
Grupa Pracuj S.A.’s PE Ratio is greater than Newag S.A. (13.36), greater than Mennica Polska S.A. (4.55), less than Mirbud S.A. (14.96), less than Torpol S.A. (17.16), greater than Lubawa S.A. (11.61), greater than Gi Group Poland S.A. (-19.84), greater than Boryszew S.A. (10.53), greater than Grenevia S.A. (4.83), less than Trakcja S.A. (27.73), less than Mo-BRUK S.A. (362.40),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 13.36 | $4.19B | |
| 4.55 | $2.24B | |
| 14.96 | $1.60B | |
| 17.16 | $1.31B | |
| 11.61 | $1.10B | |
| -19.84 | $388.27M | |
| 10.53 | $1.21B | |
| 4.83 | $1.75B | |
| 27.73 | $1.47B | |
| 362.40 | $1.10B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Grupa Pracuj S.A. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Grupa Pracuj S.A. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Grupa Pracuj S.A.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) compare to its historical average?