4425.T
Price:
$1114
Market Cap:
$12.57B
Kudan Inc. engages in the development of computer software algorithms classified as artificial perception that are machine equivalent of human eyes primarily in Japan. The company provides visual-SLAM, lidar SLAM, processor optimization, sensor fusion, algorithm fusion, and connected processing solutions, as well as mapping for various use-cases. Kudan Inc. was incorporated in 2014 and is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.
Industry
Software - Application
IPO Date
2018-12-20
Stock Exchange
JPX
Ticker
4425.T
According to Kudan Inc.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -22.08. This represents a change of -245.19% compared to the average of 15.21 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Kudan Inc. over the last ten years is 2.65K. The current -22.08 PE Ratio has changed -183.42% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), 4425.T's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the June 2018 quarter at 234.34. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the March 2019 quarter at -1260.70.
Average
2.65K
Median
-21.86
Minimum
-1028.82
Maximum
24.47K
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Kudan Inc. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 580.40%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 24.47K
Minimum Annual Increase = -2478.33%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -1028.82
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -16.14 | -94.77% |
| 2024 | -308.76 | 580.40% |
| 2023 | -45.38 | 435.38% |
| 2022 | -8.48 | -61.23% |
| 2021 | -21.86 | -96.63% |
| 2020 | -649.22 | -145.38% |
| 2019 | 1.43K | -94.15% |
| 2018 | 24.47K | -2478.33% |
The current PE Ratio of Kudan Inc. (4425.T) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-123.43
5-year avg
-80.12
10-year avg
2.65K
Kudan Inc.’s PE Ratio is less than ATLED Corp. (15.41), less than i Cubed Systems, Inc. (22.25), less than Fabrica Communications Co., Ltd. (35.16), less than TECHNOLOGIES, Inc. (18.67), less than eole Inc. (82.29), less than jig.jp Co., Ltd. (7.69), less than Property Data Bank, Inc. (16.36), less than Stamen Co.,Ltd. (31.02), less than System D Inc. (19.47), less than Yappli, Inc. (13.28),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 15.41 | $10.73B | |
| 22.25 | $13.87B | |
| 35.16 | $10.74B | |
| 18.67 | $8.26B | |
| 82.29 | $12.35B | |
| 7.69 | $9.17B | |
| 16.36 | $9.99B | |
| 31.02 | $7.08B | |
| 19.47 | $12.23B | |
| 13.28 | $10.77B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Kudan Inc. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Kudan Inc. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Kudan Inc.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Kudan Inc. (4425.T)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Kudan Inc. (4425.T)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Kudan Inc. (4425.T)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Kudan Inc. (4425.T)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Kudan Inc. (4425.T) compare to its historical average?