
Company valuation, historical trends, and peer comparisons.
According to Singapore Land Group Limited’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current Enterprise Value is 4.83B. This represents a change of 14.90% compared to the average of 4.20B of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical Enterprise Value of Singapore Land Group Limited over the last ten years is 4.09B. The current 4.83B Enterprise Value has changed 17.96% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), UILCY's Enterprise Value was at its highest in in the June 2015 quarter at 6.25B. The Enterprise Value was at its lowest in in the December 2008 quarter at 1.75B.
Average
4.09B
Median
4.16B
Minimum
2.73B
Maximum
5.10B
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Singapore Land Group Limited Enterprise Value, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 80.72%
Maximum Annual Enterprise Value = 5.10B
Minimum Annual Increase = -19.44%
Minimum Annual Enterprise Value = 2.73B
| Year | Enterprise Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.93B | 80.72% |
| 2024 | 2.73B | -11.85% |
| 2023 | 3.10B | -10.82% |
| 2022 | 3.47B | -17.49% |
| 2021 | 4.21B | 14.65% |
| 2020 | 3.67B | -18.82% |
| 2019 | 4.52B | 9.91% |
| 2018 | 4.11B | -19.44% |
| 2017 | 5.10B | 0.68% |
| 2016 | 5.07B | -5.37% |
The current Enterprise Value of Singapore Land Group Limited (UILCY) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
3.58B
5-year avg
3.69B
10-year avg
4.09B
Singapore Land Group Limited’s Enterprise Value is less than Yanlord Land Group Limited (18.36B), less than Hongkong Land Holdings Limited (21.07B), less than Sino Land Company Limited (96.47B), less than City Developments Limited (19.02B), less than UOL Group Limited (11.07B), less than Henderson Land Development Company Limited (272.68B), less than Longfor Group Holdings Limited (161.02B), less than China Resources Land Limited (360.98B), less than CK Asset Holdings Limited (151.85B), less than China Overseas Land & Investment Limited (233.22B),
| Company | Enterprise Value | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 18.36B | $662.52M | |
| 21.07B | $17.84B | |
| 96.47B | $12.53B | |
| 19.02B | $5.18B | |
| 11.07B | $5.24B | |
| 272.68B | $17.74B | |
| 161.02B | $4.03B | |
| 360.98B | $27.84B | |
| 151.85B | $20.41B | |
| 233.22B | $17.57B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Singapore Land Group Limited using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Singapore Land Group Limited or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the Enterprise Value?
How can you use the Enterprise Value?
What is Singapore Land Group Limited's Enterprise Value?
What is the highest Enterprise Value for Singapore Land Group Limited (UILCY)?
What is the 3-year average Enterprise Value for Singapore Land Group Limited (UILCY)?
What is the 5-year average Enterprise Value for Singapore Land Group Limited (UILCY)?
How does the current Enterprise Value for Singapore Land Group Limited (UILCY) compare to its historical average?