SEA.L
Seascape Energy Asia plc, a full-cycle E&P company, focuses on acquiring oil and gas assets in Norway, Malaysia, South-East Asia, and the United Kingdom. The company was formerly known as Longboat Energy plc and changed its name to Seascape Energy Asia plc in September 2024. Seascape Energy Asia plc was incorporated in 2019 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.
Industry
Oil & Gas Energy
IPO Date
2019-11-28
Stock Exchange
LSE
Ticker
SEA.L
According to Seascape Energy Asia plc’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -7.00. This represents a change of 455.67% compared to the average of -1.26 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Seascape Energy Asia plc over the last ten years is -10.43. The current -7.00 PE Ratio has changed 6.61% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), SEA.L's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2019 quarter at 0. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the December 2020 quarter at -3.91.
Average
-10.43
Median
-3.85
Minimum
-48.14
Maximum
-0.69
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Seascape Energy Asia plc PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 313.91%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = -0.69
Minimum Annual Increase = -89.65%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -48.14
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.09 | -61.53% |
| 2023 | -2.84 | 313.91% |
| 2022 | -0.69 | -85.86% |
| 2021 | -4.86 | -2.50% |
| 2020 | -4.98 | -89.65% |
The current PE Ratio of Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-1.54
5-year avg
-2.89
10-year avg
-10.43
Seascape Energy Asia plc’s PE Ratio is less than Enwell Energy plc (8.96), greater than Jersey Oil and Gas Plc (-17.09), less than Zephyr Energy plc (-2.87), greater than Challenger Energy Group PLC (-48.06), less than Chariot Limited (-1.29), greater than Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Ltd. (-22.35), greater than Upland Resources Limited (-37.42), less than Arrow Exploration Corp. (4.93), less than Touchstone Exploration Inc. (35.75), greater than Quadrise Plc (-17.48),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 8.96 | N/A | |
| -17.09 | N/A | |
| -2.87 | N/A | |
| -48.06 | N/A | |
| -1.29 | N/A | |
| -22.35 | N/A | |
| -37.42 | N/A | |
| 4.93 | N/A | |
| 35.75 | N/A | |
| -17.48 | N/A |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Seascape Energy Asia plc using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Seascape Energy Asia plc or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Seascape Energy Asia plc's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Seascape Energy Asia plc (SEA.L) compare to its historical average?