9769.T
Price:
$2296
Market Cap:
$24.95B
Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. manages cram schools that offers guidance for entrance exams to junior high schools, high schools, and universities in Japan and internationally. The company was founded in 1972 and is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.
Industry
Education & Training Services
IPO Date
2000-01-04
Stock Exchange
JPX
Ticker
9769.T
According to Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 14.43. This represents a change of -227.78% compared to the average of -11.29 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. over the last ten years is 14.33. The current 14.43 PE Ratio has changed 9.97% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), 9769.T's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the March 2021 quarter at 1.47K. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the June 2024 quarter at -206.79.
Average
14.33
Median
13.50
Minimum
11.26
Maximum
18.72
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 11.68%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 18.72
Minimum Annual Increase = -20.05%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 11.26
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12.67 | 0.17% |
| 2024 | 12.65 | 9.54% |
| 2023 | 11.55 | 2.59% |
| 2022 | 11.26 | -15.01% |
| 2021 | 13.25 | -3.64% |
| 2020 | 13.75 | -20.05% |
| 2019 | 17.19 | -8.18% |
| 2018 | 18.72 | 11.68% |
| 2017 | 16.77 | 8.31% |
| 2016 | 15.48 | -5.89% |
The current PE Ratio of Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
12.29
5-year avg
12.27
10-year avg
14.33
Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd.’s PE Ratio is less than Tokyo Individualized Educational Institute, Inc. (21.60), less than SPRIX, Ltd. (27.86), greater than Human Holdings Co., Ltd. (7.02), less than Meiko Network Japan Co., Ltd. (15.43), greater than Kibun Foods Inc. (10.04), less than Natori Co., Ltd. (24.78), less than Ebara Foods Industry,Inc. (24.01), greater than Hokuryo Co., Ltd. (9.13), greater than Mr Max Holdings Ltd. (9.22), less than Riso Kyoiku Co., Ltd. (21.18),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 21.60 | $24.01B | |
| 27.86 | $24.79B | |
| 7.02 | $19.33B | |
| 15.43 | $17.99B | |
| 10.04 | $24.13B | |
| 24.78 | $24.07B | |
| 24.01 | $24.56B | |
| 9.13 | $26.94B | |
| 9.22 | $25.70B | |
| 21.18 | $34.02B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Gakkyusha Co.,Ltd. (9769.T) compare to its historical average?