5287.T
Price:
$1110
Market Cap:
$3.27B
Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd engages in the manufacture and sale of semi-dry cast concrete products in Japan and internationally. It also imports and sells environmentally friendly products for use in sewage, landscaping, and water treatment; and sells, installs, and maintains products for building equipment. Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd was incorporated in 1950 and is headquartered in Osaka, Japan.
Industry
Construction Materials
IPO Date
Stock Exchange
JPX
Ticker
5287.T
According to Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 13.46. This represents a change of 84.14% compared to the average of 7.31 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd over the last ten years is 16.79. The current 13.46 PE Ratio has changed 7.92% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), 5287.T's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the September 2022 quarter at 42.25. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the June 2024 quarter at -89.15.
Average
16.79
Median
15.24
Minimum
5.27
Maximum
37.48
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 105.98%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 37.48
Minimum Annual Increase = -82.05%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 5.27
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5.27 | -68.31% |
| 2024 | 16.62 | 19.92% |
| 2023 | 13.86 | 105.98% |
| 2022 | 6.73 | -82.05% |
| 2021 | 37.48 | 80.16% |
The current PE Ratio of Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T) is greater than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
11.91
5-year avg
15.99
10-year avg
16.79
Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd’s PE Ratio is greater than Kyoritsu Air Tech Inc. (7.47), less than Takahashi Curtain Wall Corporation (63.01), greater than Sankyo Kasei Corporation (4.20), greater than Sanyu Co., Ltd. (7.36), less than Daiken Co.,Ltd. (18.86), less than Tsuruya Co., Ltd. (764.19), greater than Nikken Kogaku Co., Ltd. (8.82), less than Taihei Machinery Works, Limited (14.73), greater than Superbag Company, Limited (4.07), greater than Atomix Co.,Ltd. (13.08),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 7.47 | $3.47B | |
| 63.01 | $4.11B | |
| 4.20 | $3.95B | |
| 7.36 | $3.96B | |
| 18.86 | $4.57B | |
| 764.19 | $3.09B | |
| 8.82 | $2.62B | |
| 14.73 | $3.60B | |
| 4.07 | $3.99B | |
| 13.08 | $3.67B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Ito Yogyo Co., Ltd (5287.T) compare to its historical average?