5276.TWO
Price:
$14.95
Market Cap:
$590.52M
Da Hui Limited, an investment holding company, engages in the production and sale of motorcycle components and child safety seats in the United States, Malaysia, and internationally. It offers motorcycle lights. The company was founded in 1994 and is headquartered in New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Industry
Auto - Parts
IPO Date
2014-06-12
Stock Exchange
TWO
Ticker
5276.TWO
According to Da Hui Limited’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 14.66. This represents a change of -17.31% compared to the average of 17.73 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Da Hui Limited over the last ten years is 16.13. The current 14.66 PE Ratio has changed 8.99% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), 5276.TWO's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the March 2024 quarter at 176.25. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the March 2023 quarter at -192.50.
Average
16.13
Median
23.09
Minimum
-38.48
Maximum
81.86
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Da Hui Limited PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 0%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 81.86
Minimum Annual Increase = -312.73%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -38.48
| Year | PE Ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26.59 | -236.78% |
| 2023 | -19.44 | -199.19% |
| 2022 | 19.60 | -26.44% |
| 2021 | 26.64 | -67.46% |
| 2020 | 81.86 | -312.73% |
The current PE Ratio of Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO) is greater than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
8.91
5-year avg
27.05
10-year avg
16.13
Da Hui Limited’s PE Ratio is less than Polygreen Resources Co., Ltd. (39.23), greater than Est Global Apparel Co.,Ltd (-22.29), greater than Architectural Aesthetics Global Development CO.,LTD. (5.60), greater than Lifestyle Global Enterprise Inc. (-13.46), greater than Jui Li Enterprise Co., Ltd. (-14.47), greater than Dacome International Ltd. (12.34), greater than Les Enphants Co., Ltd. (-0.99), greater than Tan De Tech Co., Ltd (-44.07), less than Mister International Enterprise Corp. (15.97), greater than Joy Industrial Co., Ltd. (-20347.62),
| Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
|---|---|---|
| 39.23 | $740.42M | |
| -22.29 | $571.50M | |
| 5.60 | $592.09M | |
| -13.46 | $591.36M | |
| -14.47 | $745.21M | |
| 12.34 | $700.40M | |
| -0.99 | $462.55M | |
| -44.07 | $768.25M | |
| 15.97 | $707.94M | |
| -20347.62 | $420.00M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Da Hui Limited using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Da Hui Limited or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Da Hui Limited's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Da Hui Limited (5276.TWO) compare to its historical average?